[Q18-Q33] Latest IAPP CIPM First Attempt, Exam real Dumps Updated [Jun-2024]

Share

Latest IAPP CIPM First Attempt, Exam real Dumps Updated [Jun-2024]

Get the superior quality CIPM Dumps Questions from ValidBraindumps. Nobody can stop you from getting to your dreams now. Your bright future is just a click away!

NEW QUESTION # 18
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
It's just what you were afraid of. Without consulting you, the information technology director at your organization launched a new initiative to encourage employees to use personal devices for conducting business. The initiative made purchasing a new, high-specification laptop computer an attractive option, with discounted laptops paid for as a payroll deduction spread over a year of paychecks. The organization is also paying the sales taxes. It's a great deal, and after a month, more than half the organization's employees have signed on and acquired new laptops. Walking through the facility, you see them happily customizing and comparing notes on their new computers, and at the end of the day, most take their laptops with them, potentially carrying personal data to their homes or other unknown locations. It's enough to give you data- protection nightmares, and you've pointed out to the information technology Director and many others in the organization the potential hazards of this new practice, including the inevitability of eventual data loss or theft.
Today you have in your office a representative of the organization's marketing department who shares with you, reluctantly, a story with potentially serious consequences. The night before, straight from work, with laptop in hand, he went to the Bull and Horn Pub to play billiards with his friends. A fine night of sport and socializing began, with the laptop "safely" tucked on a bench, beneath his jacket. Later that night, when it was time to depart, he retrieved the jacket, but the laptop was gone. It was not beneath the bench or on another bench nearby. The waitstaff had not seen it. His friends were not playing a joke on him. After a sleepless night, he confirmed it this morning, stopping by the pub to talk to the cleanup crew. They had not found it. The laptop was missing. Stolen, it seems. He looks at you, embarrassed and upset.
You ask him if the laptop contains any personal data from clients, and, sadly, he nods his head, yes. He believes it contains files on about 100 clients, including names, addresses and governmental identification numbers. He sighs and places his head in his hands in despair.
From a business standpoint, what is the most productive way to view employee use of personal equipment for work-related tasks?

  • A. The use of personal equipment must be reduced as it leads to inevitable security risks.
  • B. Any computer or other equipment is company property whenever it is used for company business.
  • C. The use of personal equipment is a cost-effective measure that leads to no greater security risks than are always present in a modern organization.
  • D. While the company may not own the equipment, it is required to protect the business-related data on any equipment used by its employees.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
This answer reflects the principle of accountability, which states that the company is responsible for ensuring that personal data is processed in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, regardless of who owns or controls the equipment that stores or processes the data. The company should establish policies and procedures for managing the use of personal equipment for work-related tasks, such as requiring encryption, authentication, remote wipe, backup and reporting of incidents. The company should also provide training and awareness to the employees on how to protect the data on their personal equipment and what are their obligations and liabilities. References: IAPP CIPM Study Guide, page 841; ISO/IEC 27002:2013, section
6.2.1


NEW QUESTION # 19
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
It's just what you were afraid of. Without consulting you, the information technology director at your organization launched a new initiative to encourage employees to use personal devices for conducting business. The initiative made purchasing a new, high-specification laptop computer an attractive option, with discounted laptops paid for as a payroll deduction spread over a year of paychecks. The organization is also paying the sales taxes. It's a great deal, and after a month, more than half the organization's employees have signed on and acquired new laptops. Walking through the facility, you see them happily customizing and comparing notes on their new computers, and at the end of the day, most take their laptops with them, potentially carrying personal data to their homes or other unknown locations. It's enough to give you data- protection nightmares, and you've pointed out to the information technology Director and many others in the organization the potential hazards of this new practice, including the inevitability of eventual data loss or theft.
Today you have in your office a representative of the organization's marketing department who shares with you, reluctantly, a story with potentially serious consequences. The night before, straight from work, with laptop in hand, he went to the Bull and Horn Pub to play billiards with his friends. A fine night of sport and socializing began, with the laptop "safely" tucked on a bench, beneath his jacket. Later that night, when it was time to depart, he retrieved the jacket, but the laptop was gone. It was not beneath the bench or on another bench nearby. The waitstaff had not seen it. His friends were not playing a joke on him. After a sleepless night, he confirmed it this morning, stopping by the pub to talk to the cleanup crew. They had not found it. The laptop was missing. Stolen, it seems. He looks at you, embarrassed and upset.
You ask him if the laptop contains any personal data from clients, and, sadly, he nods his head, yes. He believes it contains files on about 100 clients, including names, addresses and governmental identification numbers. He sighs and places his head in his hands in despair.
In order to determine the best course of action, how should this incident most productively be viewed?

  • A. As an incident that requires the abrupt initiation of a notification campaign.
  • B. As the accidental loss of personal property containing data that must be restored.
  • C. As a potential compromise of personal information through unauthorized access.
  • D. As the premeditated theft of company data, until shown otherwise.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Explanation
This answer recognizes the risk of data breach that may result from the loss of the laptop, as it may expose the personal information of the clients to unauthorized or unlawful processing. A data breach is defined as a security incident that leads to the accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, unauthorized disclosure of, or access to, personal data transmitted, stored or otherwise processed. A data breach may have serious consequences for the individuals whose data is compromised, such as identity theft, fraud, discrimination, financial loss or reputational damage. Therefore, it is important to view this incident as a potential compromise of personal information and take appropriate measures to contain, assess and mitigate the impact of the breach. References: IAPP CIPM Study Guide, page 86; ISO/IEC 27002:2013, section 16.1.1


NEW QUESTION # 20
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
As the Director of data protection for Consolidated Records Corporation, you are justifiably pleased with your accomplishments so far. Your hiring was precipitated by warnings from regulatory agencies following a series of relatively minor data breaches that could easily have been worse. However, you have not had a reportable incident for the three years that you have been with the company. In fact, you consider your program a model that others in the data storage industry may note in their own program development.
You started the program at Consolidated from a jumbled mix of policies and procedures and worked toward coherence across departments and throughout operations. You were aided along the way by the program's sponsor, the vice president of operations, as well as by a Privacy Team that started from a clear understanding of the need for change.
Initially, your work was greeted with little confidence or enthusiasm by the company's "old guard" among both the executive team and frontline personnel working with data and interfacing with clients. Through the use of metrics that showed the costs not only of the breaches that had occurred, but also projections of the costs that easily could occur given the current state of operations, you soon had the leaders and key decision-makers largely on your side. Many of the other employees were more resistant, but face-to-face meetings with each department and the development of a baseline privacy training program achieved sufficient "buy-in" to begin putting the proper procedures into place.
Now, privacy protection is an accepted component of all current operations involving personal or protected data and must be part of the end product of any process of technological development. While your approach is not systematic, it is fairly effective.
You are left contemplating:
What must be done to maintain the program and develop it beyond just a data breach prevention program? How can you build on your success?
What are the next action steps?
What practice would afford the Director the most rigorous way to check on the program's compliance with laws, regulations and industry best practices?

  • A. Auditing.
  • B. Assessment.
  • C. Forensics.
  • D. Monitoring.

Answer: D


NEW QUESTION # 21
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
You lead the privacy office for a company that handles information from individuals living in several countries throughout Europe and the Americas. You begin that morning's privacy review when a contracts officer sends you a message asking for a phone call. The message lacks clarity and detail, but you presume that data was lost.
When you contact the contracts officer, he tells you that he received a letter in the mail from a vendor stating that the vendor improperly shared information about your customers. He called the vendor and confirmed that your company recently surveyed exactly 2000 individuals about their most recent healthcare experience and sent those surveys to the vendor to transcribe it into a database, but the vendor forgot to encrypt the database as promised in the contract. As a result, the vendor has lost control of the data.
The vendor is extremely apologetic and offers to take responsibility for sending out the notifications. They tell you they set aside 2000 stamped postcards because that should reduce the time it takes to get the notice in the mail. One side is limited to their logo, but the other side is blank and they will accept whatever you want to write. You put their offer on hold and begin to develop the text around the space constraints. You are content to let the vendor's logo be associated with the notification.
The notification explains that your company recently hired a vendor to store information about their most recent experience at St. Sebastian Hospital's Clinic for Infectious Diseases. The vendor did not encrypt the information and no longer has control of it. All 2000 affected individuals are invited to sign-up for email notifications about their information. They simply need to go to your company's website and watch a quick advertisement, then provide their name, email address, and month and year of birth.
You email the incident-response council for their buy-in before 9 a.m. If anything goes wrong in this situation, you want to diffuse the blame across your colleagues. Over the next eight hours, everyone emails their comments back and forth. The consultant who leads the incident-response team notes that it is his first day with the company, but he has been in other industries for 45 years and will do his best. One of the three lawyers on the council causes the conversation to veer off course, but it eventually gets back on track. At the end of the day, they vote to proceed with the notification you wrote and use the vendor's postcards.
Shortly after the vendor mails the postcards, you learn the data was on a server that was stolen, and make the decision to have your company offer credit monitoring services. A quick internet search finds a credit monitoring company with a convincing name: Credit Under Lock and Key (CRUDLOK). Your sales rep has never handled a contract for 2000 people, but develops a proposal in about a day which says CRUDLOK will:
1.Send an enrollment invitation to everyone the day after the contract is signed.
2.Enroll someone with just their first name and the last-4 of their national identifier.
3.Monitor each enrollee's credit for two years from the date of enrollment.
4.Send a monthly email with their credit rating and offers for credit-related services at market rates.
5.Charge your company 20% of the cost of any credit restoration.
You execute the contract and the enrollment invitations are emailed to the 2000 individuals. Three days later you sit down and document all that went well and all that could have gone better. You put it in a file to reference the next time an incident occurs.
Regarding the notification, which of the following would be the greatest concern?

  • A. Informing the affected individuals that data from other individuals may have also been affected.
  • B. Collecting more personally identifiable information than necessary to provide updates to the affected individuals.
  • C. Trusting a vendor to send out a notice when they already failed once by not encrypting the database.
  • D. Using a postcard with the logo of the vendor who make the mistake instead of your company's logo.

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 22
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Penny has recently joined Ace Space, a company that sells homeware accessories online, as its new privacy officer. The company is based in California but thanks to some great publicity from a social media influencer last year, the company has received an influx of sales from the EU and has set up a regional office in Ireland to support this expansion. To become familiar with Ace Space's practices and assess what her privacy priorities will be, Penny has set up meetings with a number of colleagues to hear about the work that they have been doing and their compliance efforts.
Penny's colleague in Marketing is excited by the new sales and the company's plans, but is also concerned that Penny may curtail some of the growth opportunities he has planned. He tells her "I heard someone in the breakroom talking about some new privacy laws but I really don't think it affects us. We're just a small company. I mean we just sell accessories online, so what's the real risk?" He has also told her that he works with a number of small companies that help him get projects completed in a hurry. "We've got to meet our deadlines otherwise we lose money. I just sign the contracts and get Jim in finance to push through the payment. Reviewing the contracts takes time that we just don't have." In her meeting with a member of the IT team, Penny has learned that although Ace Space has taken a number of precautions to protect its website from malicious activity, it has not taken the same level of care of its physical files or internal infrastructure. Penny's colleague in IT has told her that a former employee lost an encrypted USB key with financial data on it when he left. The company nearly lost access to their customer database last year after they fell victim to a phishing attack. Penny is told by her IT colleague that the IT team
"didn't know what to do or who should do what. We hadn't been trained on it but we're a small team though, so it worked out OK in the end." Penny is concerned that these issues will compromise Ace Space's privacy and data protection.
Penny is aware that the company has solid plans to grow its international sales and will be working closely with the CEO to give the organization a data "shake up". Her mission is to cultivate a strong privacy culture within the company.
Penny has a meeting with Ace Space's CEO today and has been asked to give her first impressions and an overview of her next steps.
To establish the current baseline of Ace Space's privacy maturity, Penny should consider all of the following factors EXCEPT?

  • A. Ace Space's documented procedures
  • B. Ace Space's employee training program
  • C. Ace Space's vendor engagement protocols
  • D. Ace Space's content sharing practices on social media

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 23
Under which circumstances would people who work in human resources be considered a secondary audience for privacy metrics?

  • A. They do not receive training on privacy issues
  • B. They do not have frequent interactions with the public
  • C. They do not have privacy policy as their main task
  • D. They do not interface with the financial office

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 24
What is one reason the European Union has enacted more comprehensive privacy laws than the United States?

  • A. To allow the free movement of data between member countries
  • B. To allow separate industries to set privacy standards
  • C. To ensure adequate enforcement of existing laws
  • D. To ensure there is adequate funding for enforcement

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation/Reference:


NEW QUESTION # 25
Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), what are the obligations of a processor that engages a sub-processor?

  • A. The processor must give the controller prior written notice and perform a preliminary audit of the sub-processor.
  • B. The processor must obtain the consent of the controller and ensure the sub-processor complies with data processing obligations that are equivalent to those that apply to the processor.
  • C. The processor must receive a written agreement that the sub-processor will be fully liable to the controller for the performance of its obligations in relation to the personal data concerned.
  • D. The processor must Obtain the controllers specifiC written authorization and provide annual reports on the sub-processor'S performance.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation
Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the obligations of a processor that engages a sub-processor are to obtain the consent of the controller and ensure the sub-processor complies with data processing obligations that are equivalent to those that apply to the processor. The GDPR defines a processor as a natural or legal person, public authority, agency, or other body that processes personal data on behalf of the controller. A sub-processor is a third party that is engaged by the processor to carry out specific processing activities on behalf of the controller. The GDPR requires that the processor does not engage another processor without prior specific or general written authorization of the controller. In the case of general written authorization, the processor must inform the controller of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of other processors, thereby giving the controller the opportunity to object to such changes. The processor must also ensure that the same data protection obligations as set out in the contract or other legal act between the controller and the processor are imposed on that other processor by way of a contract or other legal act under Union or Member State law, . References: [GDPR Article 28], [CIPM - International Association of Privacy Professionals]


NEW QUESTION # 26
What is the main reason to begin with 3-5 key metrics during the program development process?

  • A. To minimize selective data use.
  • B. To keep the focus on the main organizational objectives.
  • C. To avoid undue financial costs.
  • D. To keep the process limited to as few people as possible.

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 27
Which of the following is NOT a type of privacy program metric?

  • A. Value creation metrics.
  • B. Commercial metrics.
  • C. Data enhancement metrics.
  • D. Business enablement metrics.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
Types of privacy program metrics include business enablement metrics, data enhancement metrics, and commercial metrics. Business enablement metrics measure the effectiveness of the privacy program in enabling the business to function without compromising privacy. Data enhancement metrics measure the effectiveness of the privacy program in enhancing data protection, such as through data minimization, access controls, and data security. Commercial metrics measure the effectiveness of the privacy program in creating value, such as through the development of new products, services, and customer experiences.
Privacy program metrics are used to assess the effectiveness of a privacy program and measure its progress.
These metrics can include business enablement metrics, data enhancement metrics, and commercial metrics.
Value creation metrics, however, are not typically used as privacy program metrics.


NEW QUESTION # 28
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Manasa is a product manager at Omnipresent Omnimedia, where she is responsible for leading the development of the company's flagship product, the Handy Helper. The Handy Helper is an application that can be used in the home to manage family calendars, do online shopping, and schedule doctor appointments.
After having had a successful launch in the United States, the Handy Helper is about to be made available for purchase worldwide.
The packaging and user guide for the Handy Helper indicate that it is a "privacy friendly" product suitable for the whole family, including children, but does not provide any further detail or privacy notice. In order to use the application, a family creates a single account, and the primary user has access to all information about the other users. Upon start up, the primary user must check a box consenting to receive marketing emails from Omnipresent Omnimedia and selected marketing partners in order to be able to use the application.
Sanjay, the head of privacy at Omnipresent Omnimedia, was working on an agreement with a European distributor of Handy Helper when he fielded many Question about the product from the distributor. Sanjay needed to look more closely at the product in order to be able to answer the Question as he was not involved in the product development process.
In speaking with the product team, he learned that the Handy Helper collected and stored all of a user's sensitive medical information for the medical appointment scheduler. In fact, all of the user's information is stored by Handy Helper for the additional purpose of creating additional products and to analyze usage of the product. This data is all stored in the cloud and is encrypted both during transmission and at rest.
Consistent with the CEO's philosophy that great new product ideas can come from anyone, all Omnipresent Omnimedia employees have access to user data under a program called "Eureka." Omnipresent Omnimedia is hoping that at some point in the future, the data will reveal insights that could be used to create a fully automated application that runs on artificial intelligence, but as of yet, Eureka is not well-defined and is considered a long-term goal.
What can Sanjay do to minimize the risks of offering the product in Europe?

  • A. Sanjay should write a privacy policy to include with the Handy Helper user guide.
  • B. Sanjay should work with Manasa to review and remediate the Handy Helper as a gating item before it is released.
  • C. Sanjay should advise the distributor that Omnipresent Omnimedia has certified to the Privacy Shield Framework and there should be no issues.
  • D. Sanjay should document the data life cycle of the data collected by the Handy Helper.

Answer: D


NEW QUESTION # 29
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
As the director of data protection for Consolidated Records Corporation, you are justifiably pleased with your accomplishments so far. Your hiring was precipitated by warnings from regulatory agencies following a series of relatively minor data breaches that could easily have been worse. However, you have not had a reportable incident for the three years that you have been with the company. In fact, you consider your program a model that others in the data storage industry may note in their own program development.
You started the program at Consolidated from a jumbled mix of policies and procedures and worked toward coherence across departments and throughout operations. You were aided along the way by the program's sponsor, the vice president of operations, as well as by a Privacy Team that started from a clear understanding of the need for change.
Initially, your work was greeted with little confidence or enthusiasm by the company's "old guard" among both the executive team and frontline personnel working with data and interfacing with clients. Through the use of metrics that showed the costs not only of the breaches that had occurred, but also projections of the costs that easily could occur given the current state of operations, you soon had the leaders and key decision-makers largely on your side. Many of the other employees were more resistant, but face-to-face meetings with each department and the development of a baseline privacy training program achieved sufficient
"buy-in" to begin putting the proper procedures into place.
Now, privacy protection is an accepted component of all current operations involving personal or protected data and must be part of the end product of any process of technological development. While your approach is not systematic, it is fairly effective.
You are left contemplating: What must be done to maintain the program and develop it beyond just a data breach prevention program? How can you build on your success? What are the next action steps?
What analytic can be used to track the financial viability of the program as it develops?

  • A. Return on investment
  • B. Cost basis
  • C. Gap analysis
  • D. Breach impact modeling

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 30
What is most critical when outsourcing data destruction service?

  • A. Obtain a certificate of data destruction.
  • B. Ensure that they keep an asset inventory of the original data.
  • C. Confirm data destruction must be done on-site.
  • D. Conduct an annual in-person audit of the provider's facilities.

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 31
When supporting the business and data privacy program expanding into a new jurisdiction, it is important to do all of the following EXCEPT?

  • A. Perform an assessment of the laws applicable in that new jurisdiction.
  • B. Identify the stakeholders.
  • C. Consider culture and whether the privacy framework will need to account for changes in culture.
  • D. Appoint a new Privacy Officer (PO) for that jurisdiction.

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 32
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Perhaps Jack Kelly should have stayed in the U.S. He enjoys a formidable reputation inside the company, Special Handling Shipping, for his work in reforming certain "rogue" offices. Last year, news broke that a police sting operation had revealed a drug ring operating in the Providence, Rhode Island office in the United States.
Video from the office's video surveillance cameras leaked to news operations showed a drug exchange between Special Handling staff and undercover officers.
In the wake of this incident, Kelly had been sent to Providence to change the "hands off" culture that upper management believed had let the criminal elements conduct their illicit transactions. After a few weeks under Kelly's direction, the office became a model of efficiency and customer service. Kelly monitored his workers' activities using the same cameras that had recorded the illegal conduct of their former co-workers.
Now Kelly has been charged with turning around the office in Cork, Ireland, another trouble spot. The company has received numerous reports of the staff leaving the office unattended. When Kelly arrived, he found that even when present, the staff often spent their days socializing or conducting personal business on their mobile phones. Again, he observed their behaviors using surveillance cameras. He issued written reprimands to six staff members based on the first day of video alone.
Much to Kelly's surprise and chagrin, he and the company are now under investigation by the Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland for allegedly violating the privacy rights of employees. Kelly was told that the company's license for the cameras listed facility security as their main use, but he does not know why this matters. He has pointed out to his superiors that the company's training programs on privacy protection and data collection mention nothing about surveillance video.
You are a privacy protection consultant, hired by the company to assess this incident, report on the legal and compliance issues, and recommend next steps.
What does this example best illustrate about training requirements for privacy protection?

  • A. Training on local laws must be implemented for all personnel.
  • B. Training must be repeated frequently to respond to new legislation.
  • C. Training needs must be weighed against financial costs.
  • D. Training must include assessments to verify that the material is mastered.

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 33
......

Guaranteed Success with Valid IAPP CIPM Dumps: https://examsboost.validbraindumps.com/CIPM-exam-prep.html